Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
スプリットショックウイルス † 
The Debian Publicity Team will no longer post on X/Twitter. We took this decision since we feel X doesn't reflect Debian shared values as stated in our social contract, code of conduct and diversity statement. X evolved into a place where people we care about don't feel safe. You are very much invited to follow us on https://bits.debian.org , on https://micronews.debian.org/ , or any media as listed on https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Publicity/otherSN #debian
@debian Really? You had no problems with having debconf hosted in the Zionist state. You even refer to that illegal entity by the name "Israel". Does the Debian project have the same values as the Zionist state?
I understand a free software project not wanting to be on a proprietary platform, but this is ridiculous.
Calm down. Don't mix up leaving Xitter by @debian with your intifada dreams @shakil_tcs
@Suiseiseki @debian is it the case with regular software or only non-free firmware? My impression is that, they simply allow the non-free firmware to be the default iso.
There is no difference between proprietary peripheral software and "regular" proprietary software, as both are software and both take the users freedom just as hard.
The whole idea of calling such software "firmware" is to *confuse* the user into thinking it's something other than software and unfortunately such scheme is very successful.
>they simply allow the non-free firmware to be the default iso.
They have made the explicit choice to include many proprietary programs in the installer that take the users freedom, meaning the installer is proprietary software and if that wasn't bad enough, they don't offer a free installer *at all*, rather than nonfree "just being the default".
@fu pretty obvious, isn't it?